(Click here for readings)
“I cannot do
anything on my own; I judge as I hear, and my judgment is just, because I do not seek my own will but the will of the one who sent me.”
Jesus
continues to do his work under the ominous glares of the Pharisees, for he does
His work in the name of his Father, God. Although the modern Christian can
deride this group of men for the obvious ignorance of Jesus' divine patrimony,
the ongoing resentment they seem to direct towards Jesus should prompt some
reflection: What makes anyone so sure about Jesus' claim of God as His father?
Do most Christians even know what being the Son of God even means?
Consider
this scenario playing out today. Jesus performs miracles that defy the known
laws of science, shows wisdom that exceeds even the most subtle philosophers,
and commands more authority than the most powerful leaders in history.
Everyone, from the highest station in life to the lowest, would ask how any man
can have these qualities and where he must have come from. Interviewers from so
many countries would swarm around him and ask him his motives, his
inspirations, his background, his plans for the future. To this, Jesus responds
rather simply, “My Father is at work now, so I am at work.” These
perplexed people later learn that by “Father” he means “God,” which leads to
some uncomfortable speculations about who this man, Jesus, really is.
Everyone
would want to know how God could possibly father a human child. People would
demand proof of God's paternity—even the miracles will not suffice in this
case. They would likely take a sample of Jesus' blood and examine his body,
chart his family tree, talk with his friends and family; and with all that,
these interrogators would come up short. DNA, lineage, and background, all do
not make Jesus' God's son necessarily, particularly for those conditioned by
the classical world. Jesus is not like the demigods of the pagans, Aeneas or
Hercules, whose superhuman stature dwarf the men around them; rather, He
humbles himself to the level of normal men. Jesus is not like the pharaohs or
Roman emperors who enjoy a privileged authority enabled by their family's
divine roots; rather, though a descendent of David, He resides in obscurity as
a manual laborer. Jesus does not summon God to make a show for others; except
for perhaps the Transfiguration, which he only shows to a few select disciples,
Jesus prays quietly at night to His father.
Seeing that
Jesus cannot provide the birth certificate, DNA, or physical grandeur of a man
born of God, determining his Sonship becomes tricky. Some, like Emerson and
other transcendentalists, might take this absence of obvious proof to mean that
Jesus only claims Sonship metaphorically, not in reality. Under this logic, He
says that He is the Son of God because He has learned to see God in all things,
in all life, in a life spirit penetrating the cosmos—or some such pantheistic
reasoning. In this way, He has become one with Nature, or the Oversoul, or his
Ego, and that is why He speaks the way he does. Unfortunately, this does not
really conform the mission of Jesus. Expert meditation does not bring up people
from the dead, nor does it enable the resurrection of the body to a heavenly
kingdom. Metaphors can only work for Romantic writers and spiritual charlatans;
they do not equate to a spiritual reality.
Moving past these bogus theories
perpetuated by not a few illustrious thinkers, the Pharisees probably come the
closest to determining the source of Jesus' claim to God as Father. If a person
were to be the Messiah, the Son of God, he would follow God's laws perfectly.
Not only this, but he would place God's laws on a highest pedestal imaginable,
execute them with perfect wisdom and authority, and empower God's people to
impose these laws on the rest of the world. In this evaluation, Jesus agrees
with them wholeheartedly, “[God] has given all judgment to the Son, so that
all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father.” As the Pharisees
thought, the Son would obey the Father, and that would prove his Sonship;
moreover, that Son would have the authority of God and restore Zion. This
obedience, this authority, is what Jesus communicates to his listeners: “Amen,
amen, I say to you, the Son cannot do anything on his own, but only what he
sees the Father doing.” Jesus proves His Sonship through his obedience and
authority. He shares His Father's will perfectly, and this makes Him the Son of
God. Others may follow and become adopted sons and daughters, through that same
obedience, but He will lead as the one begotten Son, with unique authority in
the Kingdom of Heaven.
However, even if they acknowledge
Jesus' obedience to God, the Pharisees, and many Christians throughout the
ages, will still struggle with His special authority “making himself equal
to God.” Unfortunately, at this reluctance, no golden argument can be made.
Jesus can only offer Himself while there is still time on Earth, and leave it
to his listeners to accept His Sonship or turn away. They can experience the
joys promised by the Father in Isaiah, and fulfilled by Jesus in the gospels,
or they can lose their souls in the pointless pursuit of a false messiah who
proves his divinity in other ways.
This meditation was written by
Benedict Augustine, an English teacher who works in the DFW area. He has taken
on the pseudonym, Benedict Augustine, to honor his two favorite Catholic
thinkers: St. Augustine and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI.
Hypothetical question, what would Jesus' DNA look like? If Mary was his only human parent, would it be entirely hers? Or would the Y chromosomes be a random combination of human genes?
ReplyDeleteAlso, If God was truly the father, is Jesus a descendant of David? Does adoption (or the equivalent of the time) take care of this?
I'm not sure, Mario. I suspect the God who can create something out of nothing, can also create a child with only one parent's chromosomes. Who knows, we might one day do it as well, and then, we would only do what He did before us.
DeleteYou must remember, the incarnation of our Lord is surprising to us as it was to the Jews. After all, they knew perfectly well were babies came from ;)
Do most Christians even know what being the Son of God even means?
ReplyDeleteAngels, just and pious men, the descendants of Seth, were called "sons of God" (Job 1:6; 2:1; Psalm 88:7; Wisdom 2:13; etc.). Also, this name was given to Israelites (Deuteronomy 14:50); and of Israel, as a nation: "And thou shalt say to him: Thus saith the Lord: Israel is my son, my firstborn.
So it looks like the Son of God was used often in the OT, but the Son of man was used only in the NT referring to Jesus.
I just thought I would answer your question for some of us Christians.
I appreciate the references. This would then indicate some of the confusion behind what makes Jesus the only begotten Son of God. Indeed, it would take a fair amount of revelation to sort through the confusion. Whatever they thought of this idea, the Pharisees were obviously quite upset with Jesus trying to claim sonship.
DeleteConcerning the "Son of Man," I thought that this title was used in Ezekiel (37); not that it affects your point too much. Pope Emeritus Benedict discusses at length the different titles used in the gospels about Jesus in his Jesus of Nazareth series. It's an interesting read, and this discussion makes me want to read over it again.